Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Opposed (2)
Related issue
Oak tree removal for Oak Road development→At a glance
- Public comments
- 2
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed May 13, 2026.
Public comments (2)
OpposedHeather MossMay 13, 2026
Urged the commission to save the mature oaks, especially T-1 and T-41, arguing the arborist report omitted tree ages and potential historic protections, and asked the commission to deny the project.
Planning Commission (Special) - May 13, 2026 · 1:15:40 →OpposedJames McGillisMay 13, 2026
Detailed the age and size of trees T-1 (68-inch trunk, possibly 500 years old) and T-41, criticized the tree valuation and habitat thresholds, and asked that the project be denied or redesigned to preserve the oaks.
Planning Commission (Special) - May 13, 2026 · 1:20:18 →