Lost Canyons Development Modification & Open Space Expansion

Expressed concern about construction trash, questioned whether future boards might rezone the new open space for more housing, and noted traffic and wildlife impacts.

Shared concerns about rapid development altering Simi Valley's small-town equestrian character and reducing open space for riding.

Emphasized the importance of protecting natural recreation areas and trails from development impacts, citing past trail hazards near other projects.

Spoke against building in the mountains, raised fire insurance and wildfire risks, and suggested the city focus on fixing existing roads and businesses.

Expressed concerns about horse trails being blocked, wildfire risks, skyrocketing insurance rates, and increased predator activity affecting livestock.

Shared concerns as a new resident adjacent to the Ditch Road/Anderson Drive estate lots regarding setbacks, drainage, retaining walls, and trail parking.

Opposed the project due to exclusive gated design, narrow evacuation roads, water lift station and fake lake water use concerns, and inadequate fire station response times.

Questioned the purpose of the two 'Trojan houses' on Anderson and Ditch roads, asking if they are meant to enable future development in Dry Canyon.

Noted development happens but urged caution against smaller setbacks, declining project quality, grading dirt destination, and traffic noise from quarry trucks.

Questioned the justification for placing two residences at Ditch and Anderson roads and raised concerns over skyrocketing fire insurance costs.

Spoke neutrally on behalf of parents owning an adjacent lot, emphasizing truck traffic concerns and the need for clear visual plans regarding road widening.

Appreciated open space and trails but urged the commission to re-evaluate Tapo Canyon road width and wildfire evacuation safety in light of recent California fires.

Expressed disbelief that 364 homes north of Lost Canyons could evacuate as quickly as before and questioned water retention basins and water tank plans.

Urged denial of map modifications, citing deletion of 20% slope safety rules, wildfire/evacuation risks, and unauthorized trenching on shared county roads.

Strongly opposed the project, criticizing the planning commission for favoring developers over residents and citing extreme fire danger, narrow roads, and water shortages.

Suggested widening Tapo Canyon road beyond two lanes, adding cell phone towers for emergency communications, and addressing speeding and traffic accidents.

Noted long delays in road improvements along Tapo Canyon, pedestrian safety hazards near trailheads, and questioned why grading is already underway before final approvals.